Дослідження ефективності препаратів на основі клітин та їх похідних для лікування важких опікових ран

  • Л. Л. Мацевич Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України, Україна, 03680, м. Київ, вул. Акад. Заболотного, 150
  • О. Є. Папуга Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України, Україна, 03680, м. Київ, вул. Акад. Заболотного, 150
  • Т. П. Рубан Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України, Україна, 03680, м. Київ, вул. Акад. Заболотного, 150
  • Л. Л. Лукаш Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України, Україна, 03680, м. Київ, вул. Акад. Заболотного, 150
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7124/FEEO.v20.770

Анотація

Aim. The aim was to estimate the efficiency of cell-containing and non-cellular dermal coverages in animal model in vivo. Methods. We carried out the application of gel wound coverages with three different cell lines and cultural medium conditioned by these cells on the third degree burns of ICR line mice. In the control group animals were treated with fresh medium-containing gel. Photo fixation of burn wound status was carried out once a day. The results were estimated by ANOVA approach. Results. There was a statistically significant difference of burn wounds development and healing within three experimental groups treated with cell suspensions of different lines. Cell-free gels with media conditioned by these cells were shown to be effective as well. Conclusions. It has been shown the dependence of wound healing properties of coatings containing cells from the origin of these cells. The effectiveness of these coverages is supposed to be intermediated by biologically active substances secreted by the cells.
Keywords: burn wound, dermal equivalent, stem cells, skin equivalent, skin substitute, tissue engineering.

Посилання

Papuga A.Ye., Lukash L.L. Different types of biotechnological wound coverages created with the application of alive human cells. Biopolym. Cells. 2015. V. 31(2). P. 83–96. doi: 10.7124/bc.0008D1.

Adams D.C., Ramsey M.L. Grafts in dermatologic surgery: review and update on fulll and splittthickness skin grafts, free cartilage grafts and compossite grafts. Dermatol. Surg. 2005. 8 Pt 2, No. 31. P. 1055–1067. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31831.

Nicholas M.N., Jeschke M.G., Amini-Nik S. Methodologies in creating skin substitutes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016. V. 73(8). P. 3453–3472. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2252-8.

Chaudhari A.A., Vig K., Baganizi D.R., Sahu R., Dixit S., Dennis V., Singh S.R., Pillai S.R. Future Prospects for Scaffolding Methods and Biomaterials in Skin Tissue Engineering: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2016. V.17(12). doi: 10.3390/ijms17121974.

Pourmoussa A., Gardner D.J., Johnson M.B., Wong A.K. An update and review of cell-based wound dressings and their integration into clinical practice. Ann Transl Med. 2016. V.4(23). P. 243–247. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.44.

Cerqueira M.T., Pirraco R.P., Marques A.P. Stem Cells in Skin Wound Healing: Are We There Yet?. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2016. V.5(4). P. 164–175. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0607.

Lukash L.L., Iatsishina A.P., Kushniruk V.O., Pidpala O.V. Reprogrammirovanie somaticheskikh kletok vzroslogo cheloveka in vitro. Faktory eksperymental'noi evoliutsii orhanizmiv. 2011. V. 11. P. 493–498. [in Russian]

Yagi H., Soto-Gutierrez A., Parekkadan B., Kitagawa Y., Tompkins R.G., Kobayashi N., Yarmush M.L. Mesenchymal stem cells: Mechanisms of immunomodulation and homing. Cell Transplant. 2010. V.19(6). Р. 667–679. doi: 10.3727/096368910X508762.

Fodor W.L. Tissue engineering and cell based therapies, from the bench to the clinic: the potential to replace, repair and regenerate. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2003. V.1. Р. 102–107. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-102.