The influence of RL (660 nm) and BL (450 nm) on the processes of callusogenesis and morphogenesis in vitro of tomato varieties of contrary precocity

Keywords: Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., growth rate and type, callus culture, light irradiation, RL (660 nm) and BL (450 nm), growth index, morphogenesis in vitro

Abstract

Aim. To study the effect of RL (660 nm) and BL (450 nm) photoirradiation on the growth and morphogenetic reactions of callus of different origin of two tomato varieties contrasting in precocity. Methods. Two tomato varieties differing in growth type and precocity – ACE 55 VF and Kremenchutskyi – were used as plant material. Primary callus was obtained through the stage of aseptic seedlings, and three types of organs were used as explants: hypocotyl segments, cotyledon leaves, and apical parts of roots. Callus was grown on basal medium MS + 5 mg/l 2.4 D, in the dark at +26°C. The photoactivation with RL (660 nm) and BL (450 nm) was performed using Korobov LEDs. The frequency of callus proliferation, growth and morphogenetic reactions of the callus culture in vitro were analysed. Results. It was found that hypocotyl segments and cotyledon leaves of both studied varieties are more effective explants for obtaining primary callus. The ACE 55 VF variety, characterised by indeterminate growth type, forms mature callus tissue more efficiently than the determinate Kremenchutskyi variety. The photoexposure with RL (660 nm) stimulates the growth response of callus of ACE 55 VF variety. It is shown that irradiation with RL and especially BL activates the manifestation of morphogenetic reactions in callus of both varieties. Conclusions. To implement different pathways of morphogenesis in vitro, it is necessary to take into account the type of growth in vivo. Activation of the photoreceptor systems with RL and BL in the mature callus culture stimulates the processes of morphogenesis in vitro.

References

Paik I., Huq E. Plant photoreceptors: Multi-functional sensory proteins and their signaling networks. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019. Vol. 92. P. 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.03.007.

Choi D. M., Kim S. H., Han Y. J., Kim J. I. Regulation of plant photoresponses by protein kinase activity of phytochrome A. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. 24 (3). P. 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032110.

Velez-Ramirez A. I., Vreugdenhil D., Millenaar F. F., Ieperen W. Phytochrome A protects tomato plants from injuries induced by continuous light. Front. Plant Sci. 2019. Vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00019.

Wei Y., Wang S., Yu D. The role of light quality in regulating early seedling development. Plants. 2023. Vol. 12 (14). P. 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142746.

Wang S., Meng X., Tang Z. et al. Red and blue LED light supplementation in the morning pre-activates the photosynthetic system of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) leaves and promotes plant growth. Agronomy. 2022. Vol. 12. P. 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040897.

Naznin M. T., Lefsrud M., Azad M. O. K., Park C. H. Effect of different combinations of red and blue LED light on growth characteristics and pigment content of in vitro tomato plantlets. Agriculture. 2019. Vol. 9. P. 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9090196.

Song X., Guo P., Xia K. et al. Spatial transcriptomics reveals light-induced chlorenchyma cells involved in promoting shoot regeneration in tomato callus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2023. Vol. 120 (38). ID: e2310163120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2310163120.

Batista D. S., Felipe S. H. S., Silva T. D. et al. Light quality in plant tissue culture: does it matter? In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant. 2018. Vol. 54 (3). P. 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-018-9902-5.

Fan C., Manivannan A., Wei H. Light quality-mediated influence of morphogenesis in micropropagated horticultural crops: a comprehensive overview. Biomed Res Int. 2022. ID: 615079. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4615079.

Yaroshko O., Pasternak T., Larriba E., Pérez-Pérez J. M. Optimization of callus induction and shoot regeneration from tomato cotyledon explants. Plants (Basel). 2023. Vol. 12 (16). ID: 2942. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162942.

Avksentieva O. O., Chumakova V. V. Biotechnology of higher plants: culture in vitro. Educational and methodological manual. The second edition. Kharkiv, KHNU named after V. N. Karazin, 2021. 88 p. [in Ukrainian]

Yu Y., Qin W., Li Y., Zhang C. et al. Red light promotes cotton embryogenic callusogenesis by influencing endogenous hormones, polyamines and antioxidative enzyme activities. Plant Growth Regulation. 2019. Vol. 87 (2). P. 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-018-0461-x.

Hassanpour H. Potential impact of red-blue LED light on callus growth, cell viability, and secondary metabolism of Hyoscyamus reticulatus. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant. 2022. Vol. 58 (2). P. 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-021-10232-x.

Billore V., Jain M., Suprasanna P. Monochromic radiation through light-emitting diode (LED) positively augments in vitro shoot regeneration in Orchid (Dendrobium sonia). Canadian Journal of Biotechnology. 2017. Vol. 1 (2). P. 50–58. https://doi.org/10.24870/cjb.2017-000106.

Kamolsukyeunyong W., Dabbhadatta Y., Jaiprasert A. et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies candidate loci for callus induction in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plants 2024. Vol. 13 (15). P. 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13152112.