Application of nanomaterial for maturation in vitro of cattle embryos
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of nanomaterial in the environment for the further development of in vitro embryos derived from frozen-thawed oocytes in the system of conservation of genetic resources of animals at the cellular level. Methods. Biotechnological, cryobiological, morphological, cytogenetic, and statistical methods, as well as methods of statistical data processing were used in the research. Results. Oocyte-cumulus complexes (OCC) of cows were divided into four groups: three experimental, in which the maturation was performed in a medium containing 0.1, 0.01 and 0.001% UFS/sucrose and control - without the addition of nanobiomaterial. In vitro fertilization of pre-mature frozen-thawed ova of cows and subsequent maturation of embryos in the medium with the addition of UFS/sucrose (0.001%) showed an increase in the number of embryos by 16.7-22.1% compared with the addition of 0.1; 0.01% and 13.1% compared to the control group. It was found that the fragmentation rate of 2-cell cattle embryos decreased from 65.0 to 39.8% with a decrease in the concentration of UFS/sucrose from 0.1 to 0.001%. The most stable indicators of the fragmentation index from 78.4 to 50.0% were observed on the fourth day of embryo cultivation in experimental group B. Conclusions. Reducing the concentration of UFS/sucrose from 0.1 to 0.001% in the composition of the medium for in vitro maturation of cattle embryos leads to an increase of 16.7-22.1% in the number of embryos obtained.
Keywords: oocyte-cumulus complex, cryopreservation, nanomaterial, in vitro maturation, embryo.
References
Prentice J.R., Anzar M. Cryopreservation of mammalian oocyte for conservation of animal genetics. Veterinary Medicine International. 2010. Vol. 2011. 11 p. doi: 10.4061/2011/146405
Hwang I.S., Hochi S. Recent progress in cryopreservation of bovine oocytes. BioMed Research International. Published online 2014. doi: 10.1155/2014/570647
Dujíčková L., Makarevich A. V., Olexiková L., Kubovičová E., Strejček F. Methodological approaches for vitrification of bovine oocytes. Zygote. Published online by Cambridge University Press. 2020. Vol. 29 (1). Р. 1–11. doi: 10.1017/S0967199420000465
Zhengyuan Huang, Lei Gao, Yunpeng Hou, Shien Zhu, Xiangwei Fu. Cryopreservation of farm animal gametes and embryos: recent updates and progress. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. 2019, Vol. 6 (1). Р. 42–53. doi: 10.15302/J-FASE-2018231
Trotskiy P.A. Cryopreservation of oocyte-cumulus complexes of cows with different bioactive substances. Animal Breeding and Genetics. 2016. Iss. 51. P. 255–260. doi: 10.31073/abg.51.34
Punyawai K., Anakkul N., Srirattana K., Aikawa Y., Sangsritavong S., Nagai T., Imai K., Parnpai R. Comparison of Cryotop and micro volume air cooling methods for cryopreservation of bovine matured oocytes and blastocysts. Journal of Reproduction and Development. 2015. Vol. 61 (5). Р. 431–437. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2014-163
Chaves D.F., Corbin E., Almanana C., Locatelli Y., Souza-Fabjan M.G., Bhat M.H., Freitas V.J.F., Mermillod P. Vitrification of immature and in vitro matured bovine cumulus–oocyte complexes: Effects on oocyte structure and embryo development. Livestock Science. 2017. Vol. 199. P. 50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2017.02.022
Abdel-Gawad E.M.M., Abdel-Halim B.R., Helmy N.A., Badr A.F.. Effect of cryoprotective solutions, Ethylene Glycol, Dimethyle-sulfoxide and Ficoll 70 with different combination ratios on vitrification of bovine oocytes and embryos produced in vitro. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2016 Vol. 11 (10). P. 608–619. doi: 10.3923/ajava.2016.608.619
Parrish J.J., Susko-Parrish J.L., Handrow R.R. Sims M.M., First N.L. Capacitation of bovine spermatozoa by oviduct fluid. Biol. Reprod. 1989. Vol 40 (5). Р. 1020–1025.
Ushijima M., Okuda M., Nakajama T. et al. Relationship between the cell number and Quality of Day-8 bovine blastocysts. Proc. 3 rd East Jpn. Soc. Anim. Embr. Trans. 1988. No. 9. Р. 37–38.
Lakin G.F. Biometriya. Moskva: Vy`sshaya shkola, 1990. 351 p. [in Russian]