Biotechnological methods score efficacy the cryopreservation of boar semen
Aim. Estimate boar semen for suitability to cryopreservation using informative biotechnological methods (thermoresistant probe, heat resistance test) to replenish genetic resources of Animal Gene bank Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics n. M.V. Zubets, NAAS. Methods. In carrying out this work used biotechnology, cryobiological, morphological methods. Results. Mirgorod boars breed investigation we noted feature individual semen quality, which affect its suitability for cryopreservation. All boar genealogy analysis of experiment in Mirgorod breed descended from a line of boar named Lovchyk 1205, which was characterized by negative performance stability to semen cryopreservation. For morphometric and functional parameters of sperm, potentially of better quality sperm for cryopreservation was boar Mirgorod purebred № 1159, for which thermoresistant probe, heat resistance test indices was respectively 40.0 % and 35.0 %. Most suitable for cryopreservation in terms of heat resistance test boar semen was number 1159 and № 79, and amounted to 35.0 % and 30 %. Nevertheless, after thawing average sperm activity index fell to 83.7 %. Conclusions. Established a comprehensive method for assessing the suitability of native breeds boar semen cryopreservation involving of morphological and biotechnological methods
Keywords: cryobank, spermatozoa, cryopreservation, gene pool.
Narizhnyy A.G., Kreyndlina N.I. Vliianie sposobov obrabotki spermy pered zamorazhivaniem na pokazateli zamorozheno-ottaiannoy spermy. Zootekhniia. 2007. No. 7. P. 31–32. [in Russian]
Tada N., Sato M. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of raffinose and glycerol. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1990. V. 89. P. 511–516. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0890511
Ansah G.A., Buckland R.B. Genetic variation in fowl semen cholestero land phospholipid levels and the relationship of these lipids with fertility of frozen-thawed and fresh semen. Poult. Sci. 1982. V. 61. P. 623–637. doi: 10.3382/ps.0610623
Pursel V.G., Johnson L.A. Frozen boar spermatozoa: methods of thawing pellets. J. Anim. Sci. 1976. V. 42. P. 927–931. doi: 10.2527/jas1976.424927x
Rusu V., Miclea V., Zahan M. A newmodel of boar semen evalution and the impact of cryogenic factor on spermatic cells. Lucrări ştiinţifice Zootehnie şi Biotehnologii. 2009. V. 42(1). Р. 85–91.
Holt W.V., Van Look K.J.W. Concepts in sperm heterogeneity, sperm selection and sperm competition as biological foundations for laboratory tests of semen quality. Reproduction. 2005. V. 127. P. 527–535. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00134
Kvasnyts'kyy O.V., Martynenko H.A., Kovalenko V.F., Bazalevych A.V. Sposib prohnozuvannia termostresstiykosti spermiiv knura. Patent Ukrainy na korysnu model' No. 52538 vid 25.08.2010. Biul. No 16. [in Ukrainian]
Metlyts'ka O.I. Metodolohiia DNK – pasportyzatsii henofondiv sil's'kohospodars'kykh tvaryn za hipervariabel'nymy lokusamy henomu: dys. doktora s.-h. nauk: 03.00.15. Chubyns'ke. 2012. 382 p. [in Ukrainian]